On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Thomas Narten wrote:
And help me understand how this equates to the AS112 issues. For sites
that (today) get PI space and don't actually advertise it to the
internet, aren't the DNS issues _exactly_ the same?
IMHO, if reverse DNS is provided, it should be required that the
authoritative DNS servers have non-ULA addresses. I think Mark was assuming
that ULA address for authoritative delegation point might be OK, which would
lead to issues if the ULA address is not reachable from everywhere where
reverse DNS lookups should succeed.
... and then you are back to being bound to some IP addresses (for
your DNS) belong to someone and you might not want that at all.
Enterprises changing providers also need to change IP for their DNS, or
simple get PI for these IP addresses. And if you get PI, why ULA-C?!
--
------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
