At Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:53:48 -0400,
Suresh Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out. I will be adding the reference to
> RFC2526 under Informational. Yes.
Okay, then the problem is whether we can safely categorize the
reference to RFC2526 as informative. I personally don't think it's
safe:
> > address RFC will become a draft standard; but I'd categorize it as
> > normative in the above context because implementors must refer to
> > RFC2526 to implement the privacy-addrs spec.
but I personally wouldn't oppose to your proposed action either (I
often feel the downref rule doesn't help much for implementors in
practice while it can easily be an unnecessary showstopper in the
standardization process). In any event, I think we should confirm the
consensus about the categorization in this wg (and possibly with the
ADs).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
