> The sole purpose of this group is in the maintenance of the core >IPv6 protocol specifications and *not* in the development of new >solutions or changes to the specifications. For example, the deployment >of new transition tools is out of scope of this working group. >Proposals for work beyond the scope of this working group should be sent >to relevant ADs. > > Please review the proposed charter and provide comments.
i think it is a bit minor, but i thought i should bring it up. from the proposed charter: > o Complete work on Centrally Allocated Unique Local Addresses (ULA-C) >Jul 2008 Submit ULA-C specification to IESG as a Proposed Standard i'm not too sure if ULA-C has wg consenssu to be the way forward. so i would object to this wording. note: there was problem raised in SIDR as to how to handle X509 certs for ULA (or ULA-C? i'm not sure about it) itojun -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------