Hi Suresh,
I believe the wording allows us to add work items that the WG
wishes to adopt. So, if/when this working group is formed, you can
formally request the WG to consider adoption of that work item.
Or are you arguing for including that work item in the initial
charter?
Regards,
Brian
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Brian,
I would like the WG charter to be a bit more wider.e.g. Allow other
updates to the base specs, if needed. One such item that I would like to
be considered is the usefulness of hop by hop options.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-krishnan-ipv6-hopbyhop-01.txt
Thanks
Suresh
Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
I have revised the charter for the proposed IPv6 maintenance WG
based on comments received. Please review.
Regards,
Brian
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chair(s):
Robert Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Internet Area Director(s):
Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mark Townsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Internet Area Advisor:
Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mailing Lists: ipv6@ietf.org
Description of Working Group:
The 6man working group is responsible for the maintenance, upkeep, and
advancement
of the IPv6 protocol specifications and addressing architecture. It
is not chartered to
develop major changes or additions to the IPv6 specifications.
The working group will address protocol limitations/issues discovered
during
deployment and operation. It will also serve as a venue for
discussing the proper location
for working on IPv6-related issues within the IETF.
The working group's work items are as follows:
o Shepherd completion of standardization of RA Flags Option
o Shepherd completion of standardization of the RH0 Deprecation
document
o Complete standardization of IPv6 over PPP Compression
Negotiation as a Proposed Standard
o Complete work on Centrally Allocated Unique Local Addresses
(ULA-C)
All new work items not listed above require the approval of the working
group and IESG before they will be taken on by the working group.
Goals and Milestones:
Oct 2007 Submit RH0 Deprecation specification to IESG as a
Proposed Standard
Jan 2008 Submit PPP Compression Negotiation specification to IESG
as a Proposed Standard
Mar 2008 Determine way forward for ULA-C specification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
