This looks OK to me. One warm ipv6 wg topic at present that may (or may not) need adding is the resurgence of the issues discussed in Thomas Narten's 3177bis draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-02) which I think has expired?
Or is this being left solely as an RIR issue? Also, could the cahirs confirm the final status of the existing eight WG drafts as listed at: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html Four of these aren't mentioned in the revised charter; are they expected to complete before 6MAN forms? Tim On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:35:54AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > I have revised the charter for the proposed IPv6 maintenance WG > based on comments received. Please review. > > Regards, > Brian > > IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Chair(s): > > Robert Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Internet Area Director(s): > > Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mark Townsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Internet Area Advisor: > > Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Mailing Lists: ipv6@ietf.org > > > Description of Working Group: > > The 6man working group is responsible for the maintenance, upkeep, and > advancement > of the IPv6 protocol specifications and addressing architecture. It is not > chartered to > develop major changes or additions to the IPv6 specifications. > The working group will address protocol limitations/issues discovered during > deployment and operation. It will also serve as a venue for discussing the > proper location > for working on IPv6-related issues within the IETF. > > The working group's work items are as follows: > > o Shepherd completion of standardization of RA Flags Option > o Shepherd completion of standardization of the RH0 Deprecation document > o Complete standardization of IPv6 over PPP Compression Negotiation as a > Proposed Standard > o Complete work on Centrally Allocated Unique Local Addresses (ULA-C) > > All new work items not listed above require the approval of the working > group and IESG before they will be taken on by the working group. > > > Goals and Milestones: > > Oct 2007 Submit RH0 Deprecation specification to IESG as a Proposed > Standard > Jan 2008 Submit PPP Compression Negotiation specification to IESG as a > Proposed Standard > Mar 2008 Determine way forward for ULA-C specification > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
