Hi Brian,
Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Suresh,
I believe the wording allows us to add work items that the WG
wishes to adopt. So, if/when this working group is formed, you can
formally request the WG to consider adoption of that work item.
Sounds good.
Or are you arguing for including that work item in the initial
charter?
No. I think the the initial work items are fine as they are. I just
believe it must be easy to work on other maintenance updates to the base
specs (i.e. no recharter). If this is the case, I am fine with the
current charter.
Thanks
Suresh
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
