> > From a purely cosmetic standpoint, I think MRU (Max Receive Unit) is a lot > > more readable that EMTU_R. > > I agree about the cosmetics, however "EMTU_R" is precisely > defined in RFC1122 and is used in this document exactly > per its RFC1122 specification. I couldn't find a similar > reference for "MRU".
Hmm, I may have spoken too soon; RFC4213 uses the term MRU, but does not define it precisely. Perhaps this document should define MRU in terms of how it relates to RFC1122 EMTU_R, then use the term MRU thereafter? Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
