Sorry, that was a cut & paste mistake. AH is a MAY.

John 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Vishwas Manral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: 05 March, 2008 12:12
>To: Loughney John (Nokia-OCTO/PaloAlto)
>Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: Security Requirements for IPv6 Node Req summary
>
>Hi John,
>
>RFC4301 states AH is optional. Is there a reason why we are 
>making it a MUST be supported feature. Below quoting RFC4301:
>
>"IPsec implementations MUST support ESP and MAY
>   support AH."
>
>Thanks,
>Vishwas
>
>On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:46 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>  The RFC 4294-bis draft has the following requirement, which comes 
>> from  the initial RFC.
>>
>>   8.1. Basic Architecture
>>
>>    Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol [RFC-4301] MUST be
>>    supported.
>>
>>   8.2. Security Protocols
>>
>>    ESP [RFC-4303] MUST be supported.  AH [RFC-4302] MUST be 
>supported.
>>
>>  We have had a lot of discussion that people basically feel 
>that these  
>> requirements  are not applicable and should be moved to SHOULD.  I 
>> would say that  there is rough  WG Consensus on this.  Do 
>people feel 
>> if there should be additional text  to explain  this?
>>
>>  I suggest that the WG Chairs and our ADs discuss this with the 
>> Security  ADs to ensure  that this is a reasonable consensus 
>to adopt 
>> - so that we do not run  into issues  during the eventual IETF/IESG 
>> review.  I am not sure that we can go much  further in  
>discussions in 
>> the WG.
>>
>>  Does anyone have comments on this approach?
>>
>>  John
>>
>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>  ipv6@ietf.org
>>  Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to