Le Friday 14 March 2008 00:44:11 Francis Dupont, vous avez écrit : > Perhaps some of us didn't remember but: > - I predicted the RFC 3484 will be always at least a phase back from > what we want. > - I predicted too it would take a not reasonable amount of time to > get the document published or updated.
IMHO, the real problem is that the various documents that added/removed special address ranges failed to appropriately "UPDATE" RFC3484... I'm thinking about Teredo, ULA, site-local deprecation and ORCHID here, but I may be missing some others. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
