On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > I think I am in general agreement of the consequences, but it isn't > about scope, it is about reachability. Anytime there is a a choice of > addresses to use, the same issue come to play. It's hard to know > about > reachability with out prior knowledge or trying it out and seeing what > works. This applies to ULAs and other global scope unicast addresses, > IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, etc., etc.
By this line of reasoning, scope is irrelevant. The only thing that the Robustness Principle would guide towards is the ability to exchange datagrams and open state with one's peer. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
