On 2008-12-04 04:56, Thomas Narten wrote: > Upleveling for a minute, why are we even including Link Layers in the > Node *Requirements* doc? > > Clearly, we aren't *requiring* any of them, since choice of > appropriate L2s depends on the environment.
... > How about removing all of the individual subections (4.1 - 4.3) and > add a simple table that lists the IPv6 over Foo documents that folk > might want to be aware of. 100% agreement. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
