On 2008-11-18 10:35, Daniel Park wrote: > Confusing...definitely RFC5121 must be implemented for IPv6 over WiMAX > network. EthernetCS must be too. No need to decide which CS must be used for > WiMAX by 6man...?
My understanding is that in the IETF we try to avoid situations where two ways of doing the same thing MUST be implemented. I hope that 16ng will produce an applicability statement, but I don't see what we can usefully say in the node requirements. Brian > > Daniel > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Brian E Carpenter < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 2008-11-18 09:03, Daniel Park wrote: >>> Brian (ccing 16ng list) >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel, >>>> >>>> On 2008-11-14 22:19, Daniel Park wrote: >>>>> John, >>>>> >>>>> I would make a minor change according to the valuable comments from the >>>>> WiMAX expert: >>>>> >>>>> There are two ways to transfer IPv6 over WiMAX: >>>>> - IPv6 over WiMAX using IPCS: RFC5121 >>>>> - IPv6 over Ethernet carried over WiMAX: AD Evaluation (ID Status) >>>> Where does your suggested preference for the IPv6 CS come from? >>>> Does 16ng have a consensus on this preference? >>>> >>>> Since I can't imagine anyone *not* implementing the Ethernet CS, >>>> doesn't this make extra work for all implementors, compared >>>> with preferring the Ethernet CS for both IP versions? >>> >>> We had long discussion on that before..:-) Yes, IPv6CS (RFC5121) comes >> from >>> 16ng WG. And EthernetCS is too. Prebably, the consensus you mentioned >> above >>> means which CS is a mandatory or optional for IPv6 implementation or >>> both. Well, 16ng WG just leaves them to the business choice in WiMAX >>> networks since that is beyond scope of 16ng. As of today, obviously >> mobile >>> biz wants to implement IPv6CS only, and wired biz (looks like DSL) wants >> to >>> implemt EthernetCS. But, no one knows what happens tomorrow in WiMAX >>> networks. >> Then it seems to me there is no useful statement to be made >> in the node requirements document. If 16ng has no recommendation, >> I don't see how 6man can decide. >> >> Thanks >> >> Brian >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------