Teemu,
Well, I'd like to see a definitive statement of what the
consensus of 16ng is on this point, and then IMHO
the node requirements should exactly reflect that consensus.
Brian
On 2008-11-18 06:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> My recollection on this is that Ethernet CS is intended for CPE
> ("wireless DSL") use cases and IP CSes more for handhelds. In this
> regard IP CSes correspond very closely on 3GPP IPv4/IPv6 PDP contexts.
>
> Furthermore, Ethernet CS is optional feature while support for IP CSes
> is mandatory.
>
> In future I'm sure there will be a lot more devices using IPv6 over IPv6
> CS/IPv6 PDP context/IPv6 EPS bearers than PPP.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Teemu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of ext Brian E Carpenter
>> Sent: 16 November, 2008 21:13
>> To: Daniel Park
>> Cc: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView); ipv6@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP
>> version 6 over WiMAX
>>
>> Daniel,
>>
>> On 2008-11-14 22:19, Daniel Park wrote:
>>> John,
>>>
>>> I would make a minor change according to the valuable comments from
>>> the WiMAX expert:
>>>
>>> There are two ways to transfer IPv6 over WiMAX:
>>> - IPv6 over WiMAX using IPCS: RFC5121
>>> - IPv6 over Ethernet carried over WiMAX: AD Evaluation (ID Status)
>> Where does your suggested preference for the IPv6 CS come from?
>> Does 16ng have a consensus on this preference?
>>
>> Since I can't imagine anyone *not* implementing the Ethernet
>> CS, doesn't this make extra work for all implementors,
>> compared with preferring the Ethernet CS for both IP versions?
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>> So.
>>>
>>> 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121
>>>
>>> Nodes supporting IPv6 via IPCS over WiMAX networks MUST implement
>>>
>>> "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE
>>> 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121].
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Park sent this issue in:
>>>>
>>>> I'd request one more requirement for this bis. It is about 16ng
>>>> deliverable for IPv6 transmission over IPv6CS networks as RFC 5121.
>>>> Due to Convergence Sublayer characteristics of WiMAX networks, the
>>>> below requirement must be included in the Node Requirement.
>> (For example:
>>>> globally unique prefix must be assigned to the WiMAX node, DAD
>>>> considerations, ND features, and etc described in RFC 5121)
>>>>
>>>> 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121
>>>>
>>>> Nodes supporting IPv6 over WiMAX networks MUST implement
>>>>
>>>> "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE
>>>> 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121].
>>>>
>>>> --> I think this seems like a reasonable thing to add.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
