As Daniel has also mentioned in another email, I do not believe that 16NG
can make a recommendation about when to use a specific CS for IPv6
transport. It depends on the deployment models and operators.
-Raj
On 11/17/08 2:06 PM, "ext Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Teemu,
>
> Well, I'd like to see a definitive statement of what the
> consensus of 16ng is on this point, and then IMHO
> the node requirements should exactly reflect that consensus.
>
> Brian
>
> On 2008-11-18 06:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> My recollection on this is that Ethernet CS is intended for CPE
>> ("wireless DSL") use cases and IP CSes more for handhelds. In this
>> regard IP CSes correspond very closely on 3GPP IPv4/IPv6 PDP contexts.
>>
>> Furthermore, Ethernet CS is optional feature while support for IP CSes
>> is mandatory.
>>
>> In future I'm sure there will be a lot more devices using IPv6 over IPv6
>> CS/IPv6 PDP context/IPv6 EPS bearers than PPP.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Teemu
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of ext Brian E Carpenter
>>> Sent: 16 November, 2008 21:13
>>> To: Daniel Park
>>> Cc: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView); ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: Node Req: Issue 6: Support for RFC 5121: IP
>>> version 6 over WiMAX
>>>
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> On 2008-11-14 22:19, Daniel Park wrote:
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>> I would make a minor change according to the valuable comments from
>>>> the WiMAX expert:
>>>>
>>>> There are two ways to transfer IPv6 over WiMAX:
>>>> - IPv6 over WiMAX using IPCS: RFC5121
>>>> - IPv6 over Ethernet carried over WiMAX: AD Evaluation (ID Status)
>>> Where does your suggested preference for the IPv6 CS come from?
>>> Does 16ng have a consensus on this preference?
>>>
>>> Since I can't imagine anyone *not* implementing the Ethernet
>>> CS, doesn't this make extra work for all implementors,
>>> compared with preferring the Ethernet CS for both IP versions?
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>> So.
>>>>
>>>> 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121
>>>>
>>>> Nodes supporting IPv6 via IPCS over WiMAX networks MUST implement
>>>>
>>>> "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE
>>>> 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Park sent this issue in:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd request one more requirement for this bis. It is about 16ng
>>>>> deliverable for IPv6 transmission over IPv6CS networks as RFC 5121.
>>>>> Due to Convergence Sublayer characteristics of WiMAX networks, the
>>>>> below requirement must be included in the Node Requirement.
>>> (For example:
>>>>> globally unique prefix must be assigned to the WiMAX node, DAD
>>>>> considerations, ND features, and etc described in RFC 5121)
>>>>>
>>>>> 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121
>>>>>
>>>>> Nodes supporting IPv6 over WiMAX networks MUST implement
>>>>>
>>>>> "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE
>>>>> 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121].
>>>>>
>>>>> --> I think this seems like a reasonable thing to add.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
