Jinmei, Thanks much for the review. I think you have some section numbers mixed up from our draft in your review. I have snipped below all of your comments where I believe section numbers could be wrong. Could you please go thru the section numbers below and fix them for us and then we'd be happy to respond to your comments. I think where you say "Section 4" it is Section 3. Likewise for "Section 3, bullet 7" and "Section 3 bullet 6" should be "Section 2, bullet 6 and 7". We really weren't sure about "Section 3, bullet 3" because both sections 2 and 3 in our document have a bullet 3.
- Section 3, bullet 3. I disagree with this bullet as stated above. I won't go into further details on this at the moment because it's a rather meta level issue. - Section 3, bullet 6: I don't understand this at all. Why is this mentioned? Why only multicast? - Section 3, bullet 7: this rule isn't enforceable. I thought I already pointed it out before (please google it). - Section 4, last para: Using cached on-link determination information without first [...] This doesn't address my previous concern. Besides, this is not really a "rule" even if it's in the "host rules" section. Thanks, Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
