>>>>> "Noel" == Noel Chiappa <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> writes:
>> From: Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> the O UDP
>> checksum proposal obsoletes all the today deployed nodes which
>> check them (so all hosts I know and perhaps a lot of routers
>> too)
Noel> OK, so what are the other options for encapsulating a packet
Noel> in a IPv6 packet?
Noel> I'm told by some people that UDP-Lite isn't a standard yet?
Noel> Or is it? (It seems to have a protocol number issued?) Does
Noel> UDP-Lite work through NAT boxes? (LISP has a mobile-node
Noel> mode, which we would like to see work through NAT boxes, so
Noel> any proposed alternative solution has to work through NAT
Noel> boxes too.)
We have not reached a consensus that LISP needs to work through NATs.
I'll take your message as a statement in favor of that and a personal
opinion that they need to.
I have not seen a lot of disagreement of this assumption, nor do I
want to start that discussion now. I'm just trying to keep the
mailing list history accurate to make my job as a chair easier when I
have to turn this discussion into a conclusion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
