Mark, >> I read that as a proposal is going to be made to provide all DHCPv6 options >> in RAs. Is that the case?
The intent is to look at the minimal options necessary to support a meanigul deployment using SLACC. And not replicate everything that's in dhcpv6 into SLAAC. -- Shree -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fortune HUANG Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 8:02 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Question about SLAAC: how the host determines the prefixesallocated from different prefix pools Hi Mark, I think it should be read like this: Some options would be extended from DHCPv6 to RA, and all those extensions might be in a single draft. Best regards, Fortune -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
