> To summarize, the current document
> - retains SLAAC as a MUST
> - lists DHC (for address config) as a MAY
> - makes DHC for other configuration a SHOULD.
> - lists rfc5006bis (DNS RA Config) as a SHOULD
>
> Thoughts?
That seems compatible with reality, although I'd expect most
software writers to treat DHC as a "MUST implement" in practice.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
