On 7/24/10 11:36 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS) wrote: > >> I would prefer if nodes were required (MUST) to support one or the other >> mechanism for DNS config. Given SLAAC is a must, it would probably make >> the most sense to make rfc5006 the must. > > ++ >
Just for clarity... Do you mean RFC 5006 or its standards-track successor draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis? Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
