On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Brian Haberman wrote:
Just for clarity... Do you mean RFC 5006 or its standards-track successor draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis?
The discussion started with bis but it looks like that got dropped somewhere along the way. I think it would be problematic to require a feature that is considered experimental rather than standards track.
Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
