> I'm not against new-and-better, and I have some spare Token Ring PCMCIA > cards if you need them, but we already have an IPv6 legacy. Mikael > is arguing for a mode in which there is no ND/RA traffic whatever, > so that layer-violation code in layer 2 doesn't have to watch out > for it. That isn't realistic, IMHO, since there are millions of > devices out there that believe ND/RA is the right thing to do when > IPv6 is enabled.
no one is arguing nd/ra be removed entirely, as subnet anycast should be. the argument is that there are environments where it is not needed and dhcp should be able to be used in its place. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
