On 22/09/10 3:30 PM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Hesham Soliman wrote: > >> => I understand that, but I think that to make this work you will need >> to do that with zero modifications to the host's IPv6 stack. I don't >> think you can count on people modifying their host implementations to >> support this scenario. > > Do you count the DHCP client as part of the stack? => Not in the above statement I don't. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: New version available Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Benny Amorsen
- Re: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Benny Amorsen
- Re: New version available Rémi Després
- Re: New version available Hesham Soliman
- Re: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Hesham Soliman
- Re: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Hesham Soliman
- Re: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Hesham Soliman
- Re: New version available Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: New version available Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: New version available Randy Bush
- Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version availa... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version availa... Randy Bush
- RE: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version availa... Christian Huitema
- Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version availa... Randy Bush
- Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version availa... Karl Auer