In your letter dated Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:30:37 -0700 you wrote: >Philip Homburg wrote: >> This implies that the end-device has to be able to match RS messages >> using timestamp, i.e. its clock has to be sufficiantly accurate (to withi= >n >> 5 minutes, according to the SEND RFC) to do that or (in the case of >> failure) you would get hard to diagnose problems.=20 > >That would be a failure of SEND that is orthogonal to the presence of the m= >echanism described in <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>.
I guess you are right. SEND seems to leave out changes to the protocol parameters for sending RS messages that are required for SEND to function properly. But that is unrelated to this draft. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
