In your letter dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:05:42 -0400 you wrote: >On 10-10-22 11:01 AM, Philip Homburg wrote: >> Then I guess the obvious next question is how this interacts with SEND if >> the original 3 RS messages are lost. > >The AN-initiated RSs in this case will not be SEND protected RSs (since >we do not have the host's private key), but the edge router is still >free to send SEND protected RAs back to the host in response to this RS. >Then the host and the edge router can use SEND for protecting any >further ND messages.
I wonder what to make of that. If the SEND protected RS messages can be replaced with AN-initiated (unprotected) RS messages, then what purpose does protecting those messages serve in the SEND framework? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
