Fred Baker <f...@cisco.com> writes: > When we advance a routing protocol to Proposed Standard, for reasons > related to ancient IESG history related to routing, we generally > require a test report that shows interoperable implementations of > the standard in question.
And FWIW, I think that requirement expired and has long been OBE. See RFC 4794 "RFC 1264 Is Obsolete" While getting a routing/interoperability report is a fine thing to do, it is not and should not be a requirement to advance this (or any) draft to PS. This draft should advance on its own merits (on which I have not opinion). Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
