On Dec 17, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Thomas Narten wrote: > Fred Baker <f...@cisco.com> writes: > >> When we advance a routing protocol to Proposed Standard, for reasons >> related to ancient IESG history related to routing, we generally >> require a test report that shows interoperable implementations of >> the standard in question. > > And FWIW, I think that requirement expired and has long been OBE. > > See RFC 4794 "RFC 1264 Is Obsolete" > > While getting a routing/interoperability report is a fine thing to do, > it is not and should not be a requirement to advance this (or any) > draft to PS. > > This draft should advance on its own merits (on which I have not > opinion).
The fact is that the working group is trying to decide n something and Zigbee has relevant data. I'm simply asking for an appropriately-redacted version of the report to be made public. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
