On Feb 18, 2011, at 17:44, Mark Smith wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:55:18 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola <pek...@netcore.fi> > wrote: >> >> RFC4191 (Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes) should be >> discussed. Is this a MAY? Quite a few host implementations already support >> it. > > I think this should be a MUST, or at least a SHOULD, as the simple CPE > draft relies on this capability to support routing between internal > subnets if the WAN link is down
Which host implementations support the More-specific Routes option? I'm aware of at least one major family of implementations that does not support it, i.e. Mac OS X and iOS. -- james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> member of technical staff, core os networking -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
