In your letter dated Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:45:45 -0700 you wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Philip Homburg >> On the other hand, the difference between 1500 and 1280 is so small, I >> wonder if breaking things just because you want to send packets >> at 1500 bytes makes a lot of sense. >> >> One other thing, if this makes the IPv6 experience worse than industry >> standard for IPv4, then maybe it is also not a good idea. > >This isn't quite "packets per second will increase by 16.2%", though, >as of course not all packets are 'full'. But there will be a pps >increase.
Yes, but is avoiding that small increase worth the complexity that things break whenever an ICMP doesn't get delivered? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
