* Fred Baker: > On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Philip Homburg wrote: > >> Occasionally the subject comes up: /64 (and SLAAC) is bad because it is >> easy to DoS routers by getting to perform too much ND. > > I suppose the same might be true of ARP. Has it been observed in the > wild?
Yes, for the remote case. Sequential scanning used to trigger it. I suspect that router capacities for ARP processing have since increased. -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
