Hi Donald, Changing subject as this issue is orthogonal to the draft being last called.
On 11-09-22 07:49 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi Suresh, > ... > It's absurd for these registries to be operated so that they can get > out of sync and so that conflicting uses can be allocated for the same > EUI / derived-IID. The IANA Considerations for these registries should > be updated, if necessary, so that can't happen. I believe that the EUI > registry is, in some vague small sense, more fundamental because you > can do a variety of different things with an EUI, not just create an > IID. > > Maybe the IID registry should also be updated to show the ranges of > IIDs automatically available to EUI holders... I agree that the IID registry should list the IID ranges automatically available to holders of reserved EUIs from the IANA range. We can probably put together a short draft just to do that. Thanks Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
