On Oct 18, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > 2. Whether to allocate an EUI-64 from the IANA block and base the IID on > that, or to allocate just a reserved value per RFC 5453. Collisions are > extremely unlikely in either case. Personally, I'd prefer an EUI-64 based > approach though, because collisions based on random addresses are then ruled > out completely, and only manual or multiple MAG type collisions may occur. > That is a personal preference though. But we need to choose. Are we going > with the draft as is, or changing it to use EUI-64 allocation? I saw Suresh > support this approach, Sri had questions (were those answered and what was > your conclusion?), what about the rest of you?
I would prefer that we use an EUI-64-based approach, but my opinion is not strong enough to block the document for that reason, if others feel strongly that we should use a reserved value from some other space. Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
