-----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 3:18 PM To: Hemant Singh (shemant) Cc: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou; IPv6 WG Mailing List Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-hsingh-6man-enhanced-dad-01.txt
>However, I agree that 20 bits is small for a nonce. Note SEND in RFC 3971 has left the length of the Nonce Option to be 6 bytes or higher. I personally would like any reflected-DAD algorithm to settle on one fixed length for the nonce. Thus a question to the mailer. Which of 48 or 62 bits do folks prefer as length of the nonce for the reflected-DAD algorithm? I hope folks do not want to go any higher than 62 bits. Note the Nonce Option has specified that the option end on an 8-byte boundary and since the option is in TLV format, 16 bits are already taken by the Type and Length fields of the option. Thanks, Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
