>> I think 20 bits should be already be more than enough. For simplicity,
> I would
>> just go for 64 bits.
> 
> Appreciate the quick reply.  Note BrianC already noted that 20 bits will
> not suffice by saying "It puts you into birthday-paradox territory on a
> LAN with a few hundred nodes.".  His email is at the URL below.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14835.html
> 
> We can go for a 62 bits long nonce in the Nonce Option.  Can't pick 64
> because the Nonce Option will then not end in an 8-byte boundary.  See
> the details from RFC 3971 below. 


I think you mean 48 bits.

Ole

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hemant
> 
> 5.3.2.  Nonce Option
> 
>   The purpose of the Nonce option is to make sure that an advertisement
>   is a fresh response to a solicitation sent earlier by the node.  The
>   format of this option is described in the following:
> 
>     0                   1                   2                   3
>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |     Type      |    Length     |  Nonce ...                    |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               |
>    |                                                               |
>    .                                                               .
>    .                                                               .
>    |                                                               |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>   Type
> 
>      14
> 
>   Length
> 
>      The length of the option (including the Type, Length, and Nonce
>      fields) in units of 8 octets.
> 
>   Nonce
> 
>      A field containing a random number selected by the sender of the
>      solicitation message.  The length of the random number MUST be at
>      least 6 bytes.  The length of the random number MUST be selected
>      so that the length of the nonce option is a multiple of 8 octets.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to