* Philip Homburg: > In your letter dated Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:01:46 -0300 you wrote: >>In any, please note the difference between *accepting* atomic fragments, >>generating ICMPv6 PTB when the MTU of the constricting link is < 1280, >>and reacting to ICMPv6 PTB by generating atomic fragments. > > My strong preference would be to kill this whole atomic fragment stuff before > it goes any further.
In case this isn't obvious, this is my feeling as well. I'm still looking for a justification for the complexity of preserving this protocol aspect, but I doubt there is one. -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
