On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 22:32 +0000, Duncan, Richard (Jeremy) wrote: > That's not the case at all. In testing I have done on Unix, Linux and > Windows systems they all do (1). 5.4.5. When Duplicate Address > Detection Fails > A tentative address that is determined to be a duplicate as described above > MUST NOT be assigned to an interface, and the node SHOULD log a system > management error.
My experience with Linux is that a duplicate LLA resukts in a down interface, a duplicate GUA results in a permanently-tentative enabled interface. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://www.biplane.com.au/blog GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017 Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
