Hi Mikael, On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > >> Comments about the idea in this draft? About the problem? > > > What is the rationale for duplicating the functionality in DHCPv6-PD into > ND? If code needs to be changed, why can't that code change be to implement > existing standard instead of implementing a new standard? >
It is not just implementing that code in one node. DHCPv6-PD requires Delegating Router on a DHCP server somewhere and then Requesting Router on the edge router (there was a proposal to implement it on a UE). It is a system support issue, I think. Regards, Behcet > Isn't ND handled by the kernel in a lot of OSes? Does prefix delegation > really belong there? > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
