That is not what I said. Christian, thank you, that is the kibd of information I was looking for, and expect in the draft or from the authors.
Yours, Joel Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T -------- Original message -------- Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-ug-00.txt] From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> To: "Joel M. Halpern" <j...@joelhalpern.com> CC: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>,IPv6 Deployment Prevention <ipv6@ietf.org> > To a significant degree Randy, I agree with you in your comment about > magic bits. If I were designing IPv6 from scratch (counter-factual in > so may ways at once) I would not do it that way. > > But, unless there is an actual problem with the design the IETF has > adopted, I am reluctant to change it "just because". i know. ipv6 is perfect, widely deployed, and unchangable. i hope we all like v4 nat. randy
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
