Ole, On 06/18/2013 10:20 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > >> ping? > > We are thinking that it would be good to have a separate draft that > describes the current approaches to IID creation and how they effect > privacy and tracking. Somewhat along the lines of the email and chart > sent to the IPv6 list by Alissa Cooper. > > The stable-privacy draft should then wait until that work has > progressed.
I'm already working on such I-D.. but I disagree that progrees of this document should depend on such document. Why should it? We kind of beaten this issue to death.. and that's the reason for which I ended up adding all the text that I added to the I-D. There's people working on implementations of this document, so we should progress it in a timely fashion. Besides, my personal sense of the wg is that all of the comments I received were addressed, and that there's general agreement to move the document forward. So, procedurally-speaking, I don't understand the basis of stalling this document. Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
