Hi, On 18/06/2013 23:17, Fernando Gont wrote: > Ole, > > On 06/18/2013 10:20 AM, Ole Troan wrote: >>> ping? >> We are thinking that it would be good to have a separate draft that >> describes the current approaches to IID creation and how they effect >> privacy and tracking. Somewhat along the lines of the email and chart >> sent to the IPv6 list by Alissa Cooper. >> >> The stable-privacy draft should then wait until that work has >> progressed. > > I'm already working on such I-D.. but I disagree that progrees of this > document should depend on such document. Why should it?
I tend to agree with Fernando. The dependency is the other way round; stable-privacy-addresses is a reference for the new draft. I have the same question about draft-ietf-6man-ug. We responded to all comments in the -01 version. Brian > > We kind of beaten this issue to death.. and that's the reason for which > I ended up adding all the text that I added to the I-D. > > There's people working on implementations of this document, so we should > progress it in a timely fashion. Besides, my personal sense of the wg is > that all of the comments I received were addressed, and that there's > general agreement to move the document forward. > > So, procedurally-speaking, I don't understand the basis of stalling this > document. > > Cheers, -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------