Ron, Warren
In general I tent to agree with you.
Would you have references or data to back up these two statements?
1) " Most popular TCP [RFC0793] implementations leverage this technology
and restrict their segment size so that IP fragmentation is not
required."
2) " As a result, IPv6 fragments carrying TCP payload are
rarely observed on the Internet."
Regards,
as
On 6/20/13 10:55 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please review this draft and provide comments.
>
> Ron
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:48 AM
>> To: Ronald Bonica
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-
>> 00.txt
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF
>> repository.
>>
>> Filename: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
>> Revision: 00
>> Title: IPv6 Fragment Header Deprecated
>> Creation date: 2013-06-20
>> Group: Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 7
>> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-6man-
>> frag-deprecate-00.txt
>> Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-6man-
>> frag-deprecate
>> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-frag-
>> deprecate-00
>>
>>
>> Abstract:
>> This memo deprecates the IPv6 Fragment Header. It provides reasons
>> for deprecation and updates RFC 2460.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
