>
> "New IPv6 host implementations MAY support IPv6 fragmentation and
> reassembly"
> break things. "New IPv6 host implementations MAY support IPv6
> fragmentation but MUST support reassembly" may superior. This will
> aging out fragmentation over a longer period, new hosts will not use it
> but existing - applications will not break.
I could live with this. Would it satisfy other folks' objections?
>
> "Network operators MAY filter IPv6 fragments." is a policy thing and
> costumers have to deal with that already. So it is ok from my point of
> view.
Ack. It is a statement of fact, not an IETF imposed requirement.
Ron
>
> Hagen
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
