Hi Ole,
At 03:20 19-06-2013, Ole Troan wrote:
the action is on the chairs to initiate the WGLC, and subsequently
to review the document.
Ok.
given the discussion on the list, we are planning a larger session
on privacy, tracking and the interface identifier
in Berlin.
Ok.
I thought it would make sense to do the last call on this document,
after that discussion.
I'll comment below.
personally I would have preferred to scale back the stable-privacy
document, and move some of the general
privacy and tracking discussion to a more general draft.
the other consideration is also, what's the sudden rush? given that
interface-id generation is a local
implementation specific matter, there is nothing stopping someone
who wants different interface-id's today
to go out and implement them.
It's not a sudden rush. :-) The specification is going to be
implemented in an open source project. The only proposed changed
(see above) is the privacy and tracking discussion. Nobody has
submitted a more general draft. It seems odd to have to wait for a
session in Berlin when there isn't any concrete proposal being
discussed on the mailing list.
Regards,
-sm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
