Sure!
s/MUST/will/
ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 10:50 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica
> Cc: Randy Bush; Bob Hinden; IPv6 Maintanence; Fred Baker (fred)
> Subject: Re: "Deprecate"
>
> Hi, Ron,
>
> > - Legacy applications and transport layer protocols will continue to
> > generate fragments --- In the interest of backwards compatibility,
> > IPv6 stacks and forwarding nodes MUST continue to support inbound
> > fragmented IPv6 packets as specified in [RFC2460].
>
> I'm not sure I'd use RFC2119 language, since support for fragmentation
> is std track -- hence recommending something in this respect would be
> more std track than bcp.
>
> Besides, if you mention support for reassembly, you should also mention
> support for fragmentation.
>
> Otherwise, I fully agree with your proposed way forward.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
