My explanation was clear and covered all concerns about my algorithm (as it is not the CGA at all and so no IPR), so I also don't think there is any need to explain more. Otherwise somebody else still has a problem and not convinced.
> >> IPRs *are* a problem. If you think you know better, talk to developers. > >> > > > > I talked with Pascal and others In cisco who developed SeND. Cisco > > supports SeND modules in some of their routers. It appears that IPR > > wasn't a problem for them. :-) if so, Pascal can explain this better. > > Unless IOS has became free software, it looks like you're not reading what I'm > writing. > When we bought a cisco router with SeND capabilities, it didn't seem to be free of charge and we had to pay for the module to support SeND (it was extra cost on the router to add a module which supports SeND and other features). I also tried to download the latest IOS of cisco. It appears that it is only possible by a valid contract in my profile. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6968/ps6441/pro duct_bulletin_c25-409474.html Thanks, Hosnieh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
