> > I believe your underestimating IPRs, and also think that introduing an IPR to > RFC4941 (as this document is indirectly doing) is an extremely bad idea.
There is no IPR for my algorithm. You can name it Pseudo CGA or xxx. I only used a hash function, i.e., SHA256 that anyone can use a hash function on some inputs. > I won't fight this one with you, Hosnieh. You have received my input. > It's up to you what you do with it. > Check here please: http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/138/ <snip> b) _X__ Royalty-Free, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All Implementers Check here if this licensing declaration is limited solely to standards-track IETF documents _X_ ... Thanks, Best, Hosnieh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
