On 08/09/2013 07:39 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: >>> Check here please: >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/138/ >>> <snip> >>> b) _X__ Royalty-Free, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All >>> Implementers >> >> This is a non-starter for many free-software projects. > > As I explained before my algorithm is not CGA anyway.
It looks pretty much like it. And, in any case, it's a complex way of doing something that can be much simpler. > But, what I know and had many discussions for my other draft, SSAS, the > problem of using CGA is not IPR otherwise without any reason people accepted > SSAS and I did not need to put effort to convince people :-). The problem of your scheme is that is an extremely complex way of doing something that can be much simpler. IPRs *are* a problem. If you think you know better, talk to developers. Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
