[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17172958#comment-17172958 ]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-4160: ------------------------------------- If people write that sort in sub-query, they should have their purpose, I'm inclined that Calcite should not keep *that* smart to do it as a promotion by removing the sort. > Add configuration to retain ORDER BY in sub-query > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-4160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4160 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Reporter: Jiatao Tao > Assignee: Jiatao Tao > Priority: Minor > Attachments: image-2020-08-07-10-48-59-599.png, > image-2020-08-07-10-50-22-351.png > > > Pre discussion see in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2798 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3664 > IMO, we should at least provide a configuration about this. People use > Calcite most for its optimizer, and this info users may care, How it executed > is by the engine, but users should know this in the plan. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)