[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17172995#comment-17172995 ]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4160: -------------------------------------- [~danny0405], That may be the case. However they may have defined a view with an ORDER BY clause (for presentation purposes) and have used that view in a join query. In that case they may not be pleased paying a performance penalty because Calcite does not use a perfectly valid optimization. Hints may be a good solution to this problem. Users could add a hint to their SQL if they want the ORDER BY retained. Otherwise Calcite will remove it, per the standard. > Add configuration to retain ORDER BY in sub-query > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-4160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4160 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Reporter: Jiatao Tao > Assignee: Jiatao Tao > Priority: Minor > Attachments: image-2020-08-07-10-48-59-599.png, > image-2020-08-07-10-50-22-351.png > > > Pre discussion see in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2798 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3664 > IMO, we should at least provide a configuration about this. People use > Calcite most for its optimizer, and this info users may care, How it executed > is by the engine, but users should know this in the plan. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)