uschindler commented on pull request #1849: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1849#issuecomment-690055724
Thanks Dawid! All is fine :-) One problem that was a bit confusing when @iverase opened the original issue was this sentence: "We are running into issues when running Elasticsearch CI with java security turned on." This looks like an issue only with CI and the PR is just to workaround some bug in the CI system, which should definitely not done. I have seen many issues opened by ES people using that terminology. It should be different: If Elastic's CI discovers a bug, a person should verify and understand it, and after that open an issue with "running tests in our Elasticsearch codebase discovered a bug". The terminology that was used is confusing as it implies that only CI is not happy. Actually this bug should be visible to anybody running ES tests? 100% of all Tests should fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
