[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17697954#comment-17697954
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-7724:
-------------------------------------

rmannibucau commented on PR #1041:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1041#issuecomment-1460329789

   @elharo jul is jdk14 one (the PR adds its support, was not there not sure 
why), noop is kind of built-in but defeats the fact to log a warning on a 
random logger (but this is another ticket/issue I guess). The root cause is 
really the fact maven adds an integration layer with each slf4j implementation 
so at the end can't reliably rely on the slf4j abstraction.
   For maven - as of today - slf4j binding == slf4j-$impl + maven-slf4j-$impl 
(in embedder module), this is what can need rework the future cause the 
relationship of slf4j binding should be sufficient - fully agree with your 
statement but not current state AFAIK.




> Don't log warnings when runtime is not broken (slf4j integrations)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-7724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7724
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-4
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Priority: Minor
>
> As of now if we change the SLF4J bindings maven will issue warnings because a 
> few features are disabled but due to the nature of switching these bindings 
> it is highly likely it is intended and therefore the warning are misleading 
> more than helping.
> The solution can be to log a warning if a configured factory fails to load 
> but just log info when it succeeds.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to